Johnny Depp's lawyers first tell-all interview: Chew and Camille Vasquez respond to the questions.

Ben Chew and Camille Vasquez, Johnny Depp's lawyers, answered questions about the highly-publicized Depp vs detected trial in their 1st tell-all interview on a weekday.

Answers from mount Chew and Camille Vasquez to martyr Stephanopoulos of fine Morning America.

social media websites

— Johnny Depp's lawyers claim that social media had no influence on Amber Heard's call.

— "The jury created this call supported the proof conferred by either side."

— Chew believes there's "no basis to suspect the jurors skint their oath."

— He was upset to be told that Heard's professional person, Elaine Bredehoft, had explicit the other.

Depp's lawyers competent the Aquaman star's charges by claiming that it had been Amber Heard's own statements that influenced the jury's call. #MeToo once asked how they felt the case would have an effect on the #MeToo movement, Vasquez aforementioned she did not assume it'd, adding that "domestic violence is aware of no gender."

— "Any victim is inspired to come back forward... the decision, we feel, speaks for itself; the facts were what they were, and therefore the jury reached a unanimous call supported those facts."

The Jury

Depp's lawyers competent the Aquaman star's charges by claiming that it had been Amber Heard's own statements that influenced the jury's call.

- Vasquez aforementioned that the jury was "admonished every single night" and that "they had an incredible heap of respect for the court and therefore the method, and that they were attempting their best."

Why did the jury dismiss Amber Heard's testimony?

"During that interrogatory, we have a tendency to focus on turning her comments against her. it had been important to America that any queries we have a tendency to ask were associated with one thing she had antecedently expressed. and therefore the jury needs to see and listen to from Ms detected in this relationship on every single topic, as did the remainder of the planet."

mount went on to say: "There was a stark distinction between the 2. a lot of things were seized by Johnny. And it appeared sometimes that [Amber] had a piece of evidence for everything and refused to simply accept responsibility for love or money. That, I believe, created a distinction."

Depp's response to the landslide finish

—— "It was moving expertise. we have a tendency to be joyous for him. The professional person, WHO was tearful, aforementioned it had been an exquisite moment."

—— "He was joyful. To me, that is. He continuously incorporates a wondrous look. That day, however, he appeared 10 years younger. He appeared as if the load of the planet had been raised off his shoulders "He continued.

Suit for libel within the U.k.

The professional person conjointly divulged details concerning mister Depp's libel claim within the UK, moreover because of the underlying cause for his finish within the U.S.

— "They were beneath totally different revelation obligations...and the overwhelming proof offered during this case in Virginia well outweighed what was conferred within the UK." and that we feel the jury created the correct call."

Johnny Depp has sued his ex-wife for $50 million (£40 million) over an associate op-ed piece she wrote for the Washington Post in 2018 during which she claimed to be a sufferer of domestic abuse.

On June 1, a jury found in Depp's favor and awarded him damages totaling $15 million (£12 million). detected currently intends to attractiveness the choice. If you've got any doubts, please let Maine understand. Android 12, which debuted on the picture element half dozen series, is one of Google's most significant.